Repository logo
Log In(current)
  • Inicio
  • Personal de Investigación
  • Unidad Académica
  • Publicaciones
  • Colecciones
    Datos de Investigacion Divulgacion cientifica Personal de Investigacion Protecciones Proyectos Externos Proyectos Internos Publicaciones Tesis
  1. Home
  2. Universidad de Santiago de Chile
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Are Countermovement Jump Variables Indicators of Injury Risk in Professional Soccer Players? A Machine Learning Approach
Details

Are Countermovement Jump Variables Indicators of Injury Risk in Professional Soccer Players? A Machine Learning Approach

Journal
Applied Sciences (Switzerland)
ISSN
2076-3417
Date Issued
2025
Author(s)
Aedo-Munoz, E  
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312721
Abstract
Background: Muscle injuries are among the main problems in professional soccer, affecting player availability and team performance. Countermovement jump (CMJ) variables have been proposed as indicators of injury risk and for detecting strength imbalances, although their use is less explored than isokinetic assessments. Unlike previous studies based solely on linear statistics, this research integrates biomechanical data with machine learning approaches, providing a novel perspective for injury prediction in elite soccer. Objective: To examine the association between CMJ variables and muscle injury risk during a competitive season, considering injury incidence and effective playing minutes. It was hypothesized that specific CMJ asymmetries would be associated with a higher injury risk, and that machine learning algorithms could accurately classify players according to their injury status. Methods: Forty-one professional soccer players (18 women, 23 men) from national league teams (Chile) were assessed during preseason using force platforms. Non-contact muscle injuries and playing minutes were recorded over 10 months after the CMJ evaluations. Analyses included two-way ANOVA (sex × injury status) and machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors [KNN], Random Forest, Gradient Boosting [GB]). Results: Significant sex differences were observed in most variables (p < 0.05 and η<inf>p</inf>2 > 0.11), except peak force and peak power asymmetry. For injury status, only peak force asymmetry differed, while sex × injury interactions were found in peak power and left peak power. KNN (Accuracy = 87% and CI 95% = 71% to 96%) and GB (Accuracy = 84% and CI 95% = 68% to 94%) achieved the best classification performance between injured and non-injured players. Conclusions: CMJ did not show consistent statistical differences between injured and non-injured groups. However, machine learning models, particularly KNN and GB, demonstrated high predictive accuracy, suggesting that injuries are a complex phenomenon characterized by non-linear patterns. These findings highlight the potential of combining CMJ with machine learning approaches for functional monitoring and early detection of injury risk, though validation in larger cohorts is required before establishing clinical thresholds and preventive applications. © 2025 by the authors.
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Logo USACH

Universidad de Santiago de Chile
Avenida Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins nº 3363. Estación Central. Santiago Chile.
ciencia.abierta@usach.cl © 2023
The DSpace CRIS Project - Modificado por VRIIC USACH.

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Logo DSpace-CRIS
Repository logo COAR Notify