Repository logo
Log In(current)
  • Inicio
  • Personal de Investigación
  • Unidad Académica
  • Publicaciones
  • Colecciones
    Datos de Investigacion Divulgacion cientifica Personal de Investigacion Protecciones Proyectos Externos Proyectos Internos Publicaciones Tesis
  1. Home
  2. Universidad de Santiago de Chile
  3. Publicaciones
  4. Management Tools to Reduce Carnivore-Livestock Conflicts: Current Gap and Future Challenges
Details

Management Tools to Reduce Carnivore-Livestock Conflicts: Current Gap and Future Challenges

Journal
Rangeland Ecology and Management
ISSN
1550-7424
Date Issued
2018
Author(s)
Zorondo-Rodriguez, F  
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.02.005
Abstract
Predation on domestic animals by carnivores is a persistent problem wherever carnivores and livestock co-occur. A wide range of management tools to reduce predation has been invoked. However, the evidence of their effectiveness is still limited for a broader range of species and conditions. Using a global analysis of domestic animal predation by native carnivores under a “before-after/control-impact” framework, we assessed the effectiveness of management techniques used to reduce domestic animal predation identifying knowledge gaps and research needs. We reviewed 291 predation cases in 149 studies published between 1990 and 2017 involving 47 carnivores. Lethal control is the most common method to reduce predation in comparison with nonlethal techniques. Yet the effectiveness of both approaches remains poorly evaluated (30.1% of study cases) and largely based on producers’ perceptions (70% of cases where effectiveness was evaluated). Lethal control and night confinement of domestic animals would have no effect on reducing predation, whereas the use of livestock-guarding dogs, fencing, or herdsmen may significantly reduce domestic animal losses. When the effectiveness of each technique to reduce predation was assessed by large and mesocarnivores, fencing significantly reduced predation of domestic animals by the former. Despite little scientifically published material, our findings indicate lethal control would have no effect in reducing animal predation by native carnivores when compared with nonlethal techniques. Our study also indicates the effectiveness may vary depending on the type of carnivore involved in the conflict with livestock activity. The use of an evidence-based framework to measure and assess the differential effectiveness of nonlethal techniques and the use of complementary tools at different spatial and temporal scales must be research priorities to prevent livestock predation while promoting the conservation of carnivores in production-oriented lands as encouraged by the Convention of Biological Diversity. © 2018 Elsevier Inc.
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Logo USACH

Universidad de Santiago de Chile
Avenida Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins nº 3363. Estación Central. Santiago Chile.
ciencia.abierta@usach.cl © 2023
The DSpace CRIS Project - Modificado por VRIIC USACH.

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Logo DSpace-CRIS
Repository logo COAR Notify